A big thanks to Google for providing this forum.
Information on Sovereignty
Hello freedom lovers,
Of late there has been some competition in the area of sovereignty and freedom. There are a few sites that will tell you how to free yourself up from the United States federal municipal 'corporation'. The first one I should mention is http://supremelaw.org/. This website is run by the great Paul Andrew Mitchell. Paul is a genius in my opinion and is an absolute master of Constitutional and federal law. Many thousands of pages on this site. Paul has beaten down the IRS, the BAR associations in California, etc. You cannot go wrong with Paul Mitchell. In matters of law it would be wise to defer to Paul Mitchell.
The next website is the Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry sedm.org. This website is run by Christians who work tirelessly to promote sovereignty. But to be sovereign according to their program is very tough. Membership agreement is about eight pages long and they will hold you to it. Many excellent legal briefs, books on this site.
Now we have Frank O'Collins and the University of Ucadia and One Heaven one-heaven.org. Like the above Frank has worked tirelessly to formulate a new type of world society. Ucadia is the acronym for Universal Conscious Awareness. Frank has about a dozen websites all connected together. Frank has a talkshoe program on Wednesday nights. Frank has blown the lid off of the Roman cult of murderers and their intricate mechanism they use to control the planet. (Steve McQueen would be proud of Frank). All roads do indeed lead to Rome and this must be understood before the USA can be free again. Frank has a masterful knowledge of the relationship of trusts and estates to freedom.
It may be well to mention Santos Bonacci at this point because he has given us the knowledge of the false spiritual claims of the Roman cult with a lot of good law thrown in I suppose for good measure. Churchgoers are just the walking dead because they are basically unconscious in their waking state.Don't believe me? This is : Where Brains are Tenderly Washed, Disinfected and Made Usable Again http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.co.uk/
Now of late there has been this fellow named joseph thomas. I watched a video and he is very knowledgeable. joseph thomas claims to have some type of authority to act as a global trustee. I am trying to learn more about this trust and estate business. Now Frank O'Collins on his show put in a word about joseph and it was not flattering. I love Frank and am not trying to disparage him in any way nor would I desire to give joseph reason to claim disparagement. But there are many sources of 'law'. There are many people who study law. Frank does indeed appear to be the master of Roman Ecclesiastical Canon law. But law is a bit different. Remedies are available in the law and can a person that finds a remedy in law claim it as his or her own?
But I did notice what may be a few errors on the Ecclesiastic Deed Poll that can be downloaded here. http://office-of-pmg.com/publishImages/The-Cure-2~~element53.png. Just like it says on this document the intent of any document is referenced by its title. The 1787 Constitution is titled: Constitution for the united States of America. This document was produced by representatives of the 13 colonies now the 13 or thirteen States united. They united themselves to form a country. Generally referred to as the USA. It was for the 13 states so they used the word "for". The word united is not capitalized. On this we will defer to supremelaw.org. This much we know. But on the above EDP when the phrase is used the word united is capitalized. Is this fatal to the document. It could be. Because there is another document that was produced in 1871 or thereabouts that is very similar to the 1787 Constitution. It is called the Constitution of the United States. Or the United States Constitution. At least this is the way I innerstand it. I know one thing and that is that the Constitution precludes interference with contracts so if you have any of those contracts and have received benefits to close the deal then if you try and weasel out of paying the piper and claim the Bill of Rights as protection you will certainly lose. A gun license as attached benefits called statutes that some folks call law that only attaches to the license holder. It is a type of law only and not the Supreme Law.
The recent Heller gun case from out of the District of Columbia that purports to say that those citizens living in the District holding gun licenses have some type of 2nd Amendment protection is a sham. What part of "shall not infringe" do you not understand? Congress is Senate Document has stated what protection is available to these citizens
It may be well to mention Santos Bonacci at this point because he has given us the knowledge of the false spiritual claims of the Roman cult with a lot of good law thrown in I suppose for good measure. Churchgoers are just the walking dead because they are basically unconscious in their waking state.Don't believe me? This is : Where Brains are Tenderly Washed, Disinfected and Made Usable Again http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.co.uk/
Now of late there has been this fellow named joseph thomas. I watched a video and he is very knowledgeable. joseph thomas claims to have some type of authority to act as a global trustee. I am trying to learn more about this trust and estate business. Now Frank O'Collins on his show put in a word about joseph and it was not flattering. I love Frank and am not trying to disparage him in any way nor would I desire to give joseph reason to claim disparagement. But there are many sources of 'law'. There are many people who study law. Frank does indeed appear to be the master of Roman Ecclesiastical Canon law. But law is a bit different. Remedies are available in the law and can a person that finds a remedy in law claim it as his or her own?
But I did notice what may be a few errors on the Ecclesiastic Deed Poll that can be downloaded here. http://office-of-pmg.com/publishImages/The-Cure-2~~element53.png. Just like it says on this document the intent of any document is referenced by its title. The 1787 Constitution is titled: Constitution for the united States of America. This document was produced by representatives of the 13 colonies now the 13 or thirteen States united. They united themselves to form a country. Generally referred to as the USA. It was for the 13 states so they used the word "for". The word united is not capitalized. On this we will defer to supremelaw.org. This much we know. But on the above EDP when the phrase is used the word united is capitalized. Is this fatal to the document. It could be. Because there is another document that was produced in 1871 or thereabouts that is very similar to the 1787 Constitution. It is called the Constitution of the United States. Or the United States Constitution. At least this is the way I innerstand it. I know one thing and that is that the Constitution precludes interference with contracts so if you have any of those contracts and have received benefits to close the deal then if you try and weasel out of paying the piper and claim the Bill of Rights as protection you will certainly lose. A gun license as attached benefits called statutes that some folks call law that only attaches to the license holder. It is a type of law only and not the Supreme Law.
The recent Heller gun case from out of the District of Columbia that purports to say that those citizens living in the District holding gun licenses have some type of 2nd Amendment protection is a sham. What part of "shall not infringe" do you not understand? Congress is Senate Document has stated what protection is available to these citizens
No comments:
Post a Comment